Morgan & Morgan
For years a battle cry for United States-based companies went something like this:
Bribery is wrong. But if you enforce anti-bribery laws against U.S. companies then those companies simply cannot effectively compete with foreign companies, which are immune from prosecution under U.S. anti-bribery laws.
While always a bit unsavory, it is now flat-out untrue.
Today, eight of the top 10 Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) whistleblower settlements involve foreign companies. The Department of Justice (DOJ) has even-handedly applied the FCPA across all industries and participants. Indeed, foreign companies now account for eight of the top ten FCPA enforcement settlements. The below list comes from FCPABlog.com:
Because FCPA whistleblower laws now apply to non-issuer foreign companies, it is wrong to assume that a foreign company can avoid liability under the FCPA because that foreign company does not issue securities that must be registered with the SEC.
Panalpina World Transport Ltd. (PWT) is a Swiss shipping and freight logistics company. It does not have to register its securities with the SEC. It does have a wholly owned United States subsidiary called Panalpina Inc. (number seven on the above list), which is incorporated in New York and has a principle place of business in New Jersey. According to the DOJ’s FCPA complaint against Panalpina Inc, the company was a domestic concern and subject to FCPA.
This DOJ enforcement action reiterates a basic premise behind the FCPA; namely that if a business has sufficient ties to the United States, that business is subject to the anti-bribery provisions of the FCPA.